[bsa_pro_ad_space id=1 링크=동일] [bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]

본문 내용으로 건너뛰기

공급업체 뉴스

US – Golden Nugget wins out in ‘unshuffled card’ court case

By - 16년 2014월 XNUMX일

A Superior Court in New Jersey has ruled that the Golden Nugget in Atlantic City does not have to honour US$1.5m won by a group of baccarat players who realised the cards had not been shuffled.

Judge James Isman instructed the casino it would be allowed to recover more than $500,000 it already paid them, ruling that the game of mini-baccarat played in April 2012 was illegal under state casino rules, due to the unshuffled cards.

Kansas City playing card manufacturer Gemaco, conceded in court that it had made an error in supplying unshuffled cards to the casino, however a Golden Nugget lawyer said a confidentiality agreement prevented any further comment. Having realised the cards were being dealt in a specific pattern, the $1.5m in winnings was ‘won’ by 14 players over 41 straight hands. Many of the players were said to increase their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000. The Golden Nugget said surveillance supervisors closed in to discover how ‘a sophisticated swindling and cheating scheme’ was being carried out.

카지노 측은 “그러나 플레이 시작부터 끝까지 원고는 실제로 사기와 부정 행위를 구성하는 플레이어의 특정 행위를 식별할 수 없었다”고 밝혔다.

558,900명의 플레이어는 게임 칩으로 $977,800를 현금화할 수 있었지만 추가로 $XNUMX를 지불해야 했습니다.
Following a preliminary court ruling two years ago Golden Nugget owner Tilman Fertitta had originally offered to pay the remainder of the disputed winnings. However the players rejected the deal.

The Golden Nugget said in a statement: “We were 100 per cent vindicated by Judge Isman’s ruling. Remarkably, and despite this generous proposal, the gamblers and their lawyers steadfastly refused, and selfishly wanted more damages than just the gambling winnings. Instead of walking away with over a $1.5m win, the gamblers must now return all of their gambling chips to the Golden Nugget. There are obvious lessons to be learned by all sides as a result of this incident. Unfortunately for the gamblers, it cost them over $1.5m.”

A lawyer for several of the defendants declined to comment.

공유 방법
복사 링크